One morning in March 2020, Americans woke up to find all that was solid had melted into air.
Remember? The first change was simple but sweeping: 316 million people were urged to stay home. Nearly all of us did as we were told. We were stunned but compliant. It helped that we had nowhere to go. Schools closed. Workplaces closed. No March Madness, St. Patrick’s Day parade, Houston Rodeo.
A nationwide metamorphosis of this scale had never occurred. The air was swarming with invisible pathogens that could devour our organs. Any innocent Joe could shed them by the billions. We had to take this strange new set of givens on faith. Act first, and ask questions later. Over the first weeks, public transportation slowed; airports emptied; hair grew straggly, gray, unbarbered. Getting and spending—the unstoppable feature of American life—stopped. J. Crew, J. C. Penney, Neiman Marcus filed for bankruptcy. Nearly one in four workers filed for unemployment. Around the world landmarks that don’t close closed: Carnegie Hall (est. 1891), the Church of the Holy Sepulchre (335), the Colosseum (80). Promising startups dissolved into dust; whole sectors, from real estate to higher education, revealed ominous and foundational cracks. On April 6, the top 10 box office gross at the movies was $126, down from last year’s gross for the same date: $53,912,988.
Emotional disorders, domestic abuse, and political unrest surged.
Albert Camus would have been pleased. Indeed, seen through a lens of something like “existentialism,” the collective willingness to set an ordinary life in flames and watch it go up in smoke is stark proof that humans have not lost our vitality and imagination. We love our ruts, our rounds, our Instagram spats and set pieces. But we still got it. We can still enact dramatic, spontaneous, creative change—even when it comes at a steep cost to our homeostasis.
Camus’ greatest condemnation of the afflicted townspeople in The Plague, his 1947 novel about a fictional epidemic in Oran, Algeria, is that they are hidebound. “Our citizens work hard, but solely with the object of getting rich.” In the cramped unwillingness of Oran citizens to stop bowling, taking the streetcar, and going to work, Camus finds the sources of disease. A morally atrophied life becomes a physiologically atrophied one; and death is next.
Nevertheless, Camus goes on, “there still exist towns and countries where people have now and then an inkling of something different. In general it doesn’t change their lives. Still, they have had an intimation, and that’s so much to the good.”
Is it possible that America has proven to be a country with intimations?
Or more than intimations. Could we have, below the surface, a full-fledged revolutionary imagination—akin to the one that drove the maniacs of 1776 and 1789, 1968 and 1991—and the gall to act on it? Starting in March, market capitalism was brought to a screeching halt across America. The stock market crashed. Interest rates closed in on zero. Then, like the Grinch, our hearts grew three sizes. We expanded our capacity to care for the sick exponentially; creative volunteerism and altruism replaced the usual grind. America’s transformation has been revolutionary collective action.
At the same time, it is the people who wanted to resume their habits—employment, consumption, recreation, assembly, exhibitionism, classroom education, all of it—who called themselves radical. That too might have interested Camus. The pose of the radical has been subverted to capitalist ends. In May, Elon Musk, a master of the means of production if ever there was one, claimed with brio that he was willing to be arrested so Tesla could start making cars again. Not exactly civil disobedience. But the protesters and Musks, while maddening, are OK too—they throw into relief how committed most others are to taking a break from our current economy and politics, ideally so we can do it better next time.
The fine-grained scientific data that appears almost hourly is beguiling in part because it lets us envision the species as a species, which we had grown unaccustomed to doing. The dots and numbers are both dehumanizing—where, for example, is my own aunt, who died Easter weekend, in the case-fatality rate?—and superhumanizing. People on the graphs are elegantly aggregated and uniform; we are all the mammals that persist, sicken, recover or don’t, and sooner or later die. Some dots on these slides further represent bodies that have been risked to save the bodies of others. Every graph of coronavirus “hospitalizations” implies the service and sacrifice of unnamed others.
Subscribe to WIRED and stay smart with more of your favorite Ideas writers.
All of this makes me think of the set of way-out metaphors and once ascendant ideas proposed in the 1970s by James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis under the flower child name the Gaia Hypothesis. Lovelock and Margulis—inspiring to some, aggravating to others—described Earth in total as a self-regulating complex system that maintains the conditions for life on the planet. Have humans ever seemed so much a part of a self-regulating biosphere as when we, last spring, shaved down our identities, cultures, and routines to minimum viable products, and joined up with the global internet with the sole purpose of giving the novel coronavirus as little quarter and purchase in our cells as possible?
William Wordsworth wrote of the French Revolution: Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive, and to be young was very heaven. It’s hardly been bliss, though there have been surprise raptures here and there, as when a baby was delivered by cesarean section from a sick mother in a Covid-19 coma; the mother revived after five weeks, when she met her newborn for the first time, and left the hospital with the baby in her arms. The oldest woman in Spain, Maria Branyas, who turned 113 on March 4, also recovered from the coronavirus—and went home, her title intact. (“In terms of my health I am fine, with the same minor annoyances that anyone can have,” she said.) And always the astonishment of sacrifice: the Kansas farmer who, though his wife is highly vulnerable to infection, sent one of his five N95 masks to the governor of New York, where the contagion was then at its worst. Across the country, tens of thousands of first responders hazarded and sometimes gave their lives to go toward the virus the rest of us were fleeing.
What just happened? Wordsworth and his brothers-in-arms at the Bastille found that their bliss faded when the fighting subsided and the revolution’s ideology had to be put into practice, which drained its poetry. Revolutions never come near to meeting expectations. Their gains get reversed, reactionaries reassert themselves, mafias and dictators exploit the disarray. And of course revolutions have casualties—sometimes in unbearable numbers. But Leon Trotsky’s observation that revolution is the locomotive of history still seems about right. At the very least, we would do well to notice that we’re in the middle of one.
When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Read more about how this works.
VIRGINIA HEFFERNAN (@page88) is a regular contributor to WIRED.
This article appears in the July/August issue. Subscribe now.
Photograph: Getty Images
More Great WIRED Stories
- We can protect the economy from pandemics. Why didn’t we?
- Passionflix and the Musk of Romance
- Retro hackers are building a better Nintendo Game Boy
- The first shot: Inside the Covid vaccine fast track
- How to make your virtual jam session sound—and look—good
- 👁 Is the brain a useful model for AI? Plus: Get the latest AI news
- ✨ Optimize your home life with our Gear team’s best picks, from robot vacuums to affordable mattresses to smart speakers